Online Bible

Book of Leviticus, Chapter 13

Twitter · Facebook
Leviticus 13 NASB - New American Standard BibleLeviticus 13 NASB - New American Standard Bible

Chapter 13 of LeviticusNew American Standard Bible (NASB)



  1. ¶ Then the LORD spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying,
  2. “When a man has on the skin of his [a]body a swelling or a scab or a bright spot, and it becomes [b]an infection of leprosy on the skin of his [c]body, 1then he shall be brought to Aaron the priest or to one of his sons the priests.
  3. The priest shall look at the mark on the skin of the [d]body, and if the hair in the infection has turned white and the infection appears to be deeper than the skin of his [e]body, it is an infection of leprosy; when the priest has looked at him, he shall pronounce him unclean.
  4. But if the bright spot is white on the skin of his [f]body, and [g]it does not appear to be deeper than the skin, and the hair on it has not turned white, then the priest shall [h]isolate him who has the infection for seven days.
  5. The priest shall look at him on the seventh day, and if in his eyes the infection [i]has not changed and the infection has not spread on the skin, then the priest shall [j]isolate him for seven more days.
  6. The priest shall look at him again on the seventh day, and if the infection has faded and the mark has not spread on the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him clean; it is only a scab. And he shall 2wash his clothes and be clean.
  7. ¶ “But if the scab spreads farther on the skin after he has shown himself to the priest for his cleansing, he shall appear again to the priest.
  8. The priest shall look, and if the scab has spread on the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is leprosy.
  9. ¶ “When the infection of leprosy is on a man, then he shall be brought to the priest.
  10. The priest shall then look, and if there is a 3white swelling in the skin, and it has turned the hair white, and there is quick raw flesh in the swelling,
  11. it is [k]a chronic leprosy on the skin of his [l]body, and the priest shall pronounce him unclean; he shall not [m]isolate him, for he is unclean.
  12. If the leprosy breaks out farther on the skin, and the leprosy covers all the skin of him who has the infection from his head even to his feet, [n]as far as the priest can see,
  13. then the priest shall look, and behold, if the leprosy has covered all his [o]body, he shall pronounce clean him who has the infection; it has all turned white and he is clean.
  14. But whenever raw flesh appears on him, he shall be unclean.
  15. The priest shall look at the raw flesh, and he shall pronounce him unclean; the raw flesh is unclean, it is leprosy.
  16. Or if the raw flesh turns again and is changed to white, then he shall 4come to the priest,
  17. and the priest shall look at him, and behold, if the infection has turned to white, then the priest shall pronounce clean him who has the infection; he is clean.
  18. ¶ “When the [p]body has a boil on its skin and it is healed,
  19. and in the place of the boil there is a white swelling or a reddish-white, bright spot, then it shall be shown to the priest;
  20. and the priest shall look, and behold, if [q]it appears to be lower than the skin, and the hair on it has turned white, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is the infection of leprosy, it has broken out in the boil.
  21. But if the priest looks at it, and behold, there are no white hairs in it and it is not lower than the skin and is faded, then the priest shall [r]isolate him for seven days;
  22. and if it spreads farther on the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is an infection.
  23. But if the bright spot remains in its place and does not spread, it is only the scar of the boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.
  24. ¶ “Or if the [s]body sustains in its skin a burn by fire, and the raw flesh of the burn becomes a bright spot, reddish-white, or white,
  25. then the priest shall look at it. And if the hair in the bright spot has 5turned white and it appears to be deeper than the skin, it is leprosy; it has broken out in the burn. Therefore, the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is an infection of leprosy.
  26. But if the priest looks at it, and indeed, there is no white hair in the bright spot and it is no [t]deeper than the skin, but is dim, then the priest shall [u]isolate him for seven days;
  27. and the priest shall look at him on the seventh day. If it spreads farther in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is an infection of leprosy.
  28. But if the bright spot remains in its place and has not spread in the skin, but is dim, it is the swelling from the burn; and the priest shall pronounce him clean, for it is only the scar of the burn.
  29. ¶ “Now if a man or woman has an infection on the head or on the beard,
  30. then the priest shall look at the infection, and if it appears to be deeper than the skin and there is thin yellowish hair in it, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean; it is a scale, it is leprosy of the head or of the beard.
  31. But if the priest looks at the infection of the scale, and indeed, it appears to be no deeper than the skin and there is no black hair in it, then the priest shall [v]isolate the person with the scaly infection for seven days.
  32. On the seventh day the priest shall look at the infection, and if the scale has not spread and no yellowish hair has [w]grown in it, and the appearance of the scale is no deeper than the skin,
  33. then he shall shave himself, but he shall not shave the scale; and the priest shall [x]isolate the person with the scale seven more days.
  34. Then on the seventh day the priest shall look at the scale, and if the scale has not spread in the skin and it appears to be no deeper than the skin, the priest shall pronounce him clean; and he shall wash his clothes and be clean.
  35. But if the scale spreads farther in the skin after his cleansing,
  36. then the priest shall look at him, and if the scale has spread in the skin, the priest need not seek for the yellowish hair; he is unclean.
  37. If in his sight the scale has remained, however, and black hair has grown in it, the scale has healed, he is clean; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.
  38. ¶ “When a man or a woman has bright spots on the skin of the [y]body, even white bright spots,
  39. then the priest shall look, and if the bright spots on the skin of their [z]bodies are a faint white, it is [aa]eczema that has broken out on the skin; he is clean.
  40. ¶ “Now if a [ab]man loses the hair of his head, he is 6bald; he is clean.
  41. If his head becomes bald at the [ac]front and sides, he is bald on the forehead; he is clean.
  42. But if on the bald head or the bald forehead, there occurs a reddish-white infection, it is leprosy breaking out on his bald head or on his bald forehead.
  43. Then 7the priest shall look at him; and if the swelling of the infection is reddish-white on his bald head or on his bald forehead, like the appearance of leprosy in the skin of the [ad]body,
  44. he is a leprous man, he is unclean. The priest shall surely pronounce him unclean; his infection is on his head.
  45. ¶ “As for the leper who has the infection, his clothes shall be torn, and 8the hair of his head shall be [ae]uncovered, and he shall 9cover his mustache and cry, ‘10Unclean! Unclean!’
  46. He shall remain unclean all the days during which he has the infection; he is unclean. He shall live alone; his dwelling shall be 11outside the camp.
  47. ¶ “When a garment has a [af]mark of leprosy in it, whether it is a wool garment or a linen garment,
  48. whether in [ag]warp or woof, of linen or of wool, whether in leather or in any article made of leather,
  49. if the mark is greenish or reddish in the garment or in the leather, or in the [ah]warp or in the woof, or in any article of leather, it is a leprous mark and shall be shown to the priest.
  50. Then 12the priest shall look at the mark and shall [ai]quarantine the article with the mark for seven days.
  51. He shall then look at the mark on the seventh day; if the mark has spread in the garment, whether in the warp or in the woof, or in the leather, whatever the purpose for which the leather is used, the mark is a [aj]leprous malignancy, it is unclean.
  52. So he shall burn the garment, whether the warp or the woof, in wool or in linen, or any article of leather in which the mark occurs, for it is a [ak]leprous malignancy; it shall be burned in the fire.
  53. ¶ “But if the priest shall look, and indeed the mark has not spread in the garment, either in the warp or in the woof, or in any article of leather,
  54. then the priest shall order them to wash the thing in which the mark occurs and he shall [al]quarantine it for seven more days.
  55. After the article with the mark has been washed, the priest shall again look, and if the mark has not changed its appearance, even though the mark has not spread, it is unclean; you shall burn it in the fire, whether an eating away has produced bareness on the top or on the front of it.
  56. ¶ “Then if the priest looks, and if the mark has faded after it has been washed, then he shall tear it out of the garment or out of the leather, whether from the warp or from the woof;
  57. and if it appears again in the garment, whether in the warp or in the woof, or in any article of leather, it is an outbreak; the article with the mark shall be burned in the fire.
  58. The garment, whether the warp or the woof, or any article of leather from which the mark has departed when you washed it, it shall then be washed a second time and will be clean.”
  59. ¶ This is the law for the mark of leprosy in a garment of wool or linen, whether in the warp or in the woof, or in any article of leather, for pronouncing it clean or unclean.


FOOTNOTES

  1. ^ Lit flesh
  2. ^ Lit a mark, stroke, and so throughout the ch
  3. ^ Lit flesh
  4. ^ Lit flesh
  5. ^ Lit flesh
  6. ^ Lit flesh
  7. ^ Lit the appearance of it is not deeper
  8. ^ Lit shut up
  9. ^ Lit has stood
  10. ^ Lit shut up
  11. ^ Lit an old
  12. ^ Lit flesh
  13. ^ Lit shut up
  14. ^ Lit with regard to the whole sight of the priest’s eyes
  15. ^ Lit flesh
  16. ^ Lit flesh
  17. ^ Lit the appearance of it is lower
  18. ^ Lit shut up
  19. ^ Lit flesh
  20. ^ Lit lower
  21. ^ Lit shut up
  22. ^ Lit shut up
  23. ^ Lit been
  24. ^ Lit shut up
  25. ^ Lit flesh
  26. ^ Lit flesh
  27. ^ Lit tetter
  28. ^ Lit man’s head becomes bald
  29. ^ Lit border of his face
  30. ^ Lit flesh
  31. ^ Or disheveled
  32. ^ Lit infection, and so throughout the ch
  33. ^ Or weaving or texture
  34. ^ Or weaving or texture
  35. ^ Lit shut up
  36. ^ Lit malignant leprosy
  37. ^ Lit malignant leprosy
  38. ^ Lit shut up

REFERENCES

  1. ^ De 24:8
  2. ^ Le 11:25; 14:8
  3. ^ Nu 12:10; 2Ki 5:27; 2Ch 26:19, 20
  4. ^ Lu 5:12-14
  5. ^ Ex 4:6; Nu 12:10; 2Ki 5:27
  6. ^ 2Ki 2:23; Is 15:2; Am 8:10
  7. ^ Le 10:10; Eze 22:26
  8. ^ Le 10:6
  9. ^ Eze 24:17, 22; Mc 3:7
  10. ^ La 4:15
  11. ^ Nu 5:1-4; 12:14
  12. ^ Eze 44:23

Read Leviticus Chapter 13 in other Bible versions:

Comments

  1. Kiamia DoelKiamia Doel
    Jan 9, 2025 23:00 GMT

    The NWT adds words to the text that are not in the greek Manuscripts to fit it's own doctrinal position for example

    Compare the wording of the NWT and the NKJV at Colossians 1:15-17

    NKJV says

    15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.

    NWT says

    15 He is the image of the invisible God,the firstborn OF all creation;16 because by means of him all OTHER things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible,whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All OTHER things have been created through him and for him. 17 Also, he is before all OTHER things,and by means of him all OTHER things were made to exist,

    The word “other” is not in the Greek but they add it Why? So they can decieve their followers into thinking that Christ was created by the Father and that he then created other things, that is not what the Greek says.

    1. SmeSme
      Feb 27, 2025 11:17 GMT

      Truth is from God and those that follow him. As for lies? John8:44

      Kiamia, I noticed you used a modern version of kjv to make your point about the nwt.

      Why didn’t you use the original kjv of col1:15?

      Is it because it disproves your point? It proves the opposite of what you wrote?

      Here is kjv col1:15 ¶” Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn OF every creature:“

      Now I appeal to your Christian nature to correct your mistake as God is watching each of us, and let us bless the God of Jesus his father.

      Kjv 1Pe 1:3  Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ….

  2. YanekYanek
    Dec 24, 2024 22:18 GMT

    Joshua, Jehovah’s Witnesses have never denied the deity of the Messiah in his prehuman existence. While on Earth he was fully 100% human. I do not mean he was a mere human, he was not affected by Adam’s unfaithful behavior, he was sinless.

  3. David yakubuDavid yakubu
    Oct 29, 2022 08:05 GMT

    When i do read some comments and seeing that its the same people that are supposed to be called believers but are talking ill of other denominations, it hurts. Let us all remember that We should judge not

    1. jonas smithjonas smith
      Apr 23, 2023 02:57 GMT

      The bible tells us to test the spirits. Satan disguises himself as angel of light. So yes some denomination are not teaching the truth. You are responsible for judging which ones are not. You have to judge the truth at all times. this is what the bible teaches

  4. THTH
    Apr 7, 2021 00:20 GMT

    The NWT is a very good translation. Dr. Jason David BeDuhn PhD attests to that in his book Truth in Translation. drive.google.com/...5p16melHzg8/view

    1. James LernerJames Lerner
      Jul 20, 2024 09:48 GMT

      The NWT is Satanic filth to its very core.

      The JW Cult is Satanic to its very core.

      Praise Yahweh I will never be a victim of JW brainwashing. If I burn in Hell for eternity or I am ultimately annihilated so be it

      May Yahweh's curse rest on the Watchtower Society and its Satanic leadership

    2. jim mcleodjim mcleod
      Aug 22, 2021 06:16 GMT

      NWT is a false translation that takes away from the deity of Jesus !

  5. SlightlyChaoticSlightlyChaotic
    Jan 30, 2021 16:33 GMT

    Thank you for taking the time to provide this service. I like seeing the NASB on your web page in the same format as I read on paper. On other sites, the text area is smaller, and so I have to keep scrolling down to read and sometimes I lose the context. So I really appreciate the format.

    As far as the NWT, you are certainly free to do whatever you think best with your own web pages. I'd suggest that you make a note anytime you have a translation that is associated with only one denomination or church, for example:
    New World Translation (Jehovah's Witness version).

    In Jesus' parable of the wheat and the tares. the main idea seems to be that you can't easily distinguish between God's people and not-God's people on this earth, so our Lord's response is to wait until they are shown to be the kind of people they are inside. But the NWT seems like false teaching to me. So I think the warning passages from Jesus' apostles are more applicable, as in 2 Peter 3:15-16, when he talks about Paul's writings:
    "There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures."
    And we also have the positive exhortations, as in 2 Timothy 2:15:
    "Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth."

    1. BroderickBroderick
      Jan 31, 2021 00:57 GMT

      Your suggestion regarding the denominational flagging is duly noted. But I can’t help but wonder, wouldn’t a Catholic also want “Protestant versions” marked as well?

      As for the parable, I’m pretty sure the slaves were convinced in their own minds that they could tell the tares from the wheat. After all, aren’t they the ones who identified the problem in the first place? But the master obviously thought otherwise.

      Furthermore, even at the time when Jesus himself was walking the earth, not everybody who claimed fellowship actually followed him causing John to inquire at Mark 9:39, “Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in Your name, and we tried to prevent him because he was not following us.” But Jesus said, “Do not hinder him . . . for he who is not against us is for us.”

  6. Joshua HarderJoshua Harder
    Dec 11, 2020 17:48 GMT

    Hello, question.. why have you included the NWT with other legitimate bible translations? Or why have you not atleast included a warning to readers? Don't you fear that someone could be influenced by the Watchtower's intentional heresies? Thank you.

    1. KevinKevin
      Jul 11, 2021 17:45 GMT

      en.m.wikipedia.org/..._Holy_Scriptures

      See the section critical review

    2. ChrisChris
      Jan 8, 2021 07:15 GMT

      Please site these intentional heresies. I am well versed in the watch tower outline and agree they are in many ways incorrect but i also bet i can point many out from EVERY established or main denomination. There is much to learn from them all as one who drinks milk?

      Judge not lest ye be judged, that is not to pass judgement on you either brother.

      I debate with scripture. I don't hold it to be true that Michael is Y'Shua HaMeshiach but I also firmly hold it to be true that our G-d and Heavenly Father are not the word encarnate and only begotten son.

      I love not seeing "lord" which i relate to baal. I feel the catholic church is a satanic establishment and I am aware a freemason started the hovies but there are evil in high places and our fight is also with principalities.

      What i'm saying is that in my darkest hours, those two were some of if not the only ones who would bring a Bible and eucharist and pray with me.

      We all fall short of the glory of G-d.

      Don't forget the NWT was recognized as the most accurate translation on Jeopardy.

      Lastly, this is different I noted than the NWT i have read and am very familiar with. Pull up the watchtower page and compare. I truly look forward to getting this one!

  7. julietjuliet
    Aug 17, 2022 09:36 GMT

    the sky is blue

  8. mercymercy
    Aug 12, 2022 21:23 GMT

    i am Mercy, the sky is blue what else do you need

    1. mercymercy
      Aug 12, 2022 21:25 GMT

      i am so sorry, it was a big mistake

  9. God is able to do all thingsGod is able to do all things
    May 17, 2021 17:59 GMT

    Jesus how much love calling yo name

  10. EmpiralEmpiral
    Jul 4, 2025 19:06 GMT

    I live in Dover, Delaware. My boyfriend Juan Tover and I have been dating for the past 4 yrs we were to get married in September of this year but it never happened..he constantly messes around with his ex's and other females every time he got caught he apologized and tell me to forgive him and I keep taking him back because I'm truly in love with this man but after a while he started messing around again...what can I do to make this man to love me and stop the messing around so we could get married and start our family? I am very happy I contacted Priest Salami regarding my problem. My boyfriend is now my HUSBAND. We got married 2 weeks ago in the United Church in Dover. My problem was solved. I am extremely happy to put his email purenaturalhealer@gmail.com  to anyone out there looking to solve his/her relationship problem. You can also WhatsApp him with his mobile number +2348105150446
    Visit his Facebook page facebook.com/priestsalami

  • Showing 1 - 10 of 10
NOTE: You are replying to 's comment. [Cancel]